Legal Opinion

Roosth v. Poth

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 24, 1943No. 11276Published

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

Appellant has filed a motion for leave to file brief after his time has expired under Rule No. 414, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. This motion is contested by appel-lee.

We have concluded that we can not or need not consider these motions as we have no jurisdiction of this attempted appeal other than to order its dismissal. 3 Tex. Jur. 104, § 52.

Appellee brought this action against appellant in his individual capacity, and also in his capacity as trustee, and some sixteen additional defendants.

From the recitations of an order dated September 21, 1942, it appears that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McClaren Rubber Co. v. Williams Auto Supply Co. of Big SpringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API