Legal Opinion
Conoco, Inc. v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided November 9, 1998No. 4:98-cv-00091PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
H. DALE COOK, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiff, Conoco’s, motion for summary judgment, brought pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Conoco brings this action under the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, and the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16, to vacate an unfavorable arbitration award. The following material facts are undisputed.
The present dispute centers on the termination by Conoco of John Botts for alleged improper conduct. At the time of his termination, Botts was a unit operator at Conoeo’s Ponca City plant and had…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Piqua v. Fraternal Order of Police, Ohio Labor Council, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Arma, S.R.O. v. Bae Systems Overseas, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Madison County Bd. of Educ. v. WilsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
- Summit County Children Services Board v. Communication Workers of America, Local 4546Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.