Legal Opinion
Redwine v. Texas
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 19, 1923No. 326PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error to the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas.
1Per curiam
Affirmed with costs upon the authority of *609Ughbanks v. Armstrong, 208 U. S. 481.
Mr. Joe Burkett and Mr. A. H. Corrigan for plaintiff in error. Mr: W. A. Keeling and Mr. L. C. Sutton for defendant in error.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ughbanks v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bess v. Pearman, SuperintendentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Ex Parte SeymourCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950