Legal Opinion

Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 1946No. 970Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

328 U.S. 275 (1946)

FISHGOLD

v.

SULLIVAN DRYDOCK & REPAIR CORP. ET AL.

No. 970.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued May 6, 1946.

Decided May 27, 1946.

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

Assistant Attorney General Sonnett argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General McGrath, Frederick Bernays Wiener, Robert L. Werner, Searcy L. Johnson, Paul A. Sweeney, Abraham J. Harris and Cecelia Goetz.

J. Read Smith argued the cause and filed a brief for the Sullivan Dry Dock Corporation, respondent.

M.H. Goldstein argued the cause and filed a brief…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Douglas; Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API