Legal Opinion
Swank v. St. Paul City Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 25, 1898No. Nos. 11,161-(64)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Ramsey county, in favor of plaintiff, for $619.06, entered in pursuance of the findings and order of O. B. Lewis, J.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The plaintiff executed to defendant a lease, for the term of one. year, of the whole of one and a part of the other of two contiguous lots in the city of St. Paul, with the buildings thereon, to be used and occupied for stabling purposes. Immediately following the habendum clause, the lease contained a. provision that,
“If all of lots 17 and 18 of block 67 aforesaid are not sold or leased at the expiration of this lease, then said second party [the lessee] is to have this said lease renewed for a term of one year more at its expiration on the same terms.”
The lease was signed by both parties.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Swank v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- State ex rel. Hurd v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
3Cited by11 opinions
- Andrews v. Marshall Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Marble v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Lucas v. Ganley Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Hanley Falls Creamery Co. v. Milton Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Tipton v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.