Legal Opinion

Valenciano v. Bateman

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 2, 1971No. Civ. 70-563PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

COPPLE, District Judge.

This is an action brought under 28 U.S.C. 1343; 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983; 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281, 2284, and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202; being an action on behalf of plaintiffs for themselves and all others similarly situated seeking injunctive relief and a declaration that Arizona Revised Statutes, § 11-297 1 as amended, is unconstitutional insofar as it requires in non-emergency cases that an indigent person be a resident of the county for the preceding twelve months before such indigent person can receive hospitalization or medical care at county expense.

The matter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Beytagh v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Vaughan v. BowerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1970
  4. Board of Supervisors, Pima County v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Board of Supervisors, Pima County v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. King v. New Rochelle Municipal Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. Barnes v. Board of Trustees, Michigan Veterans Trust FundDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1973
  4. Gallegos v. Glaser Crandell Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Besaw v. AffleckDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API