Legal Opinion

McGovern v. Hope

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 27, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On petition for physical examination of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Depue, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendants as owners and in possession of certain premises designated as Nos. 74 and 76 Newark avenue, in Jersey City. The gravamen of the plaintiff’s action as set out in her declaration is that the defendants illegally, wrongfully and unjustly maintained a pitfall in the sidewalk in front of the buildings on said premises, by means of which the plaintiff was, on the 8th of August, 1897, “severely and permanently injured, bruised and cut about her person,” in consequence of which injuries…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Schroeder v. C. R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. Lyon v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Ala. Great Southern R. R. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Newell v. NewellNew York Court of Chancery · 1841

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Camden & Suburban Railway Co. v. StetsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Bowing v. Delaware Rayon Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1937
  3. Greenhow v. Whitehead's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Kaull v. KaullAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API