McGovern v. Hope
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On petition for physical examination of plaintiff.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Depue, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendants as owners and in possession of certain premises designated as Nos. 74 and 76 Newark avenue, in Jersey City. The gravamen of the plaintiff’s action as set out in her declaration is that the defendants illegally, wrongfully and unjustly maintained a pitfall in the sidewalk in front of the buildings on said premises, by means of which the plaintiff was, on the 8th of August, 1897, “severely and permanently injured, bruised and cut about her person,” in consequence of which injuries…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Schroeder v. C. R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Lyon v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Ala. Great Southern R. R. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Newell v. NewellNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Camden & Suburban Railway Co. v. StetsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Bowing v. Delaware Rayon Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1937
- Greenhow v. Whitehead's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1946
- Kaull v. KaullAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015