Legal Opinion

State v. Martinik

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 4, 1983No. (2000)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDupont, J.

After pleading guilty to five counts of larceny in the third degree, the defendant was sentenced to concurrent suspended six month terms and placed on probation for two years, conditional upon the making of restitution payments. A warrant for the arrest of the defendant for violation of probation was issued and a hearing held thereon. The trial court concluded that probation was violated and sentenced the defendant to incarceration. The defendant appealed from that judgment.

The state claims that the arrest warrant specified two grounds for violation of probation: failure to make restitution…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GamerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  2. State v. RomanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. State v. Surprise, No. Cr 94-87686 (Nov. 9, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
  4. WINBUSH v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
  5. WINBUSH v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API