Legal Opinion

Wehmeier v. UNR Industries, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 9, 1991No. 4—90—0361, 4—90—0376, 4—90—0381 consPublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH

Following a jury trial, judgments were entered against the defendant, the Manville Corporation Asbestos Disease Compensation Fund (Fund), and in favor of plaintiffs Wehmeier, Bratcher, Schultz, Cochran and Bragonier. Judgment was entered for the Fund against plaintiffs Gray and Tynan. The Fund raises the following issues as to the judgments for Wehmeier, Bratcher, Schultz, and Cochran: (1) whether plaintiffs proved asbestos sold by Manville was a proximate cause of their injuries and/or deaths; (2) whether the trial court erred in striking the Fund’s defense that conduct of UNARCO Industries,…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Ney v. Yellow Cab Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  4. John H. Smith v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Rowe v. State Bank of LombardIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Ellis Henderson v. Michael F. Sheahan and J.W. FairmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Dillon v. Evanston HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. BalbosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Thacker v. U N R Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API