Legal Opinion
Bunker Hill Co. v. Washington Water Power Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 1977No. 12085PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISTLINE, Justice.
Appellant, Bunker Hill Company, operates an electrolytic zinc plant ht Kellogg, Idaho, which receives its electric power as a special contract customer of respondent, Washington Water Power Company (the Power Company). A contract between the parties which dates from June 1, 1956, and which has been approved by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (P.U.C.) provides for a rate review at four-year intervals at the request of either party. In 1970, the Power Company made its first request for such a review and in April, 1973, the contract was amended to provide for an immediate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Intermountain Gas Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Midland Realty Co. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Boise Water Corp. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Sandpoint Water & Light Co. v. City of SandpointIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Washington Water Power Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Grindstone Butte Mutual Canal Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- CDA Dairy Queen, Inc. v. State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Afton Energy, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Afton Energy, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.