Legal Opinion

Chester M. Himel v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 27, 1979No. 78-1593Published

1Opinion of the Court

596 F.2d 205

Chester M. HIMEL et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF

CHICAGO, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 78-1593.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued Jan. 23, 1979.

Decided March 14, 1979.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 27, 1979.

Richard F. Watt, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs-appellants.

James E. Honkisz, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Chicago, Ill., for defendant-appellee.

Before FAIRCHILD, Chief Judge, MARKEY, Chief Judge,* and BAUER, Circuit Judge.

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

1

The decision of the District Court for the Northern District of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Sauquoit Fibers Company v. Leesona Corporation, Kayser-Roth Corporation (In Its Own Name and D/B/A Kayser-Roth Hosiery Companyand Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co., Inc.) v. Leesona Corporation, Leesona Corporation v. The Duplan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Lawrence W. Lambert v. David R. Conrad and Martha CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  3. Curtiss v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Chester M. Himel v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  5. Merchants National Bank v. FrazierAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API