In Re the Mortgage of Mikolajewski
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Herrmann, J.:
Theoretically at least, this is an adversary proceeding between a husband and the administrator of his wife’s estate, based upon an alleged contract between the husband and wife. I am of the opinion that such an action is not cognizable in this Court.
At common law a contract between husband and wife was invalid and unenforceable. The Married Women’s Act of this State, which removed many of the common-law disabilities of married women, appears at Paragraph 3541, Revised Code of Delaware 1935, and provides as follows: “The property of a married woman, whether real, personal or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Plotkin v. PlotkinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1924
- Heitz v. SayersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1923
- duPont v. Wilmington Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
- Spruance v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1918
- Masten v. HerringSuperior Court of Delaware · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Loden v. Getty Oil CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
- Owens v. OwensCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958
- Skyways Motor Lodge, Corp. v. General Foods Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Owens v. OwensCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958