Legal Opinion

In Re the Mortgage of Mikolajewski

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided September 27, 1951No. Civil Action No. 115PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Herrmann, J.:

Theoretically at least, this is an adversary proceeding between a husband and the administrator of his wife’s estate, based upon an alleged contract between the husband and wife. I am of the opinion that such an action is not cognizable in this Court.

At common law a contract between husband and wife was invalid and unenforceable. The Married Women’s Act of this State, which removed many of the common-law disabilities of married women, appears at Paragraph 3541, Revised Code of Delaware 1935, and provides as follows: “The property of a married woman, whether real, personal or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Plotkin v. PlotkinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1924
  2. Heitz v. SayersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1923
  3. duPont v. Wilmington Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
  4. Spruance v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1918
  5. Masten v. HerringSuperior Court of Delaware · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loden v. Getty Oil CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
  2. Owens v. OwensCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958
  3. Skyways Motor Lodge, Corp. v. General Foods Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  4. Owens v. OwensCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API