Legal Opinion

Poulsen v. McDowell

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 8, 1944No. 4862PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlakd, Judge

Poulsen and Petersen (British Acoustic Films, Limited, assignee) , hereinafter for convenience referred to as Poulsen, have here appealed from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding to McDowell (Badio-Keith-Or-pheum Corporation, assignee) priority of invention as to three counts of the interference, which counts correspond to claims 72, 73, and 74 of the Poulsen application. Those claims were held patentable to Poulsen in a suit under R. S. § 4915,35 U. S. C. § 63 (1940) against Coe, Commissioner of Patents, by the United States Court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Poulsen v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Hoover Co. v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API