Legal Opinion

United States v. Younes Nasri

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 2, 2026No. 22-55685Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-55685 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-01134- v. WQH-BLM YOUNES NASRI, OPINION Claimant-Appellant, v. $1,152,366.18 IN FUNDS FROM BENDURA BANK AG, PORTFOLIO NUMBER XX5.280, Held in The Name of Golden Castle Technology Limited; $53,020.18 IN FUNDS FROM BENDURA BANK AG, PORTFOLIO NUMBER XX3.200, Held in The Name of Younes Nasri, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding 2 USA V. NASRI Argued…

2Cases cited142 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API