Legal Opinion

Hijos De Daniel Espuny, S.A. v. Victor M. Calderon Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoris L. Friedman, J.

Motion by defendants under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the several causes of action set forth in the complaint on the ground that they fail *984to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint sets forth three causes of action, the first alleging that defendants as agents or brokers of the plaintiff fraudulently induced plaintiff to enter into a contract with another party; the second cause of action charges defendants with conspiracy to commit a fraud, and the third cause of action is for an accounting by defendants as such agents or brokers.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Condon v. Associated Hospital ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Ochs v. . WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Matter of Hines v. State Board of ParoleNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Hanlon v. MacFadden Publications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Dutton v. . WillnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. De Daniel Espuny v. Victor M. Calderon Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  2. Desmond v. GovernaleNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API