Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Marriage of Feustel

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 20, 1991No. 89-1799Published

1DissentNeuman, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The decision reached by the majority is not only contrary to well established law but potentially inequitable in its application.

No doubt the tax law revision about which Mark complains could constitute a substantial change of circumstances warranting modification in a given case. See, e.g., In re Marriage of Habben, 260 N.W.2d 401, 403 (Iowa 1977) (right to claim income tax deductions bears on financial ability to pay support and is thus proper subject of modification). Whether any change is “substantial,” however, turns on the “overall financial condition” of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of BergfeldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  2. Ellis v. EllisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Page v. PageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. In Re the Marriage of HabbenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API