Legal Opinion

Findley v. Sorenson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1929No. Civil No. 2742PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

Contestee, in Absence op Evidence That Someone Other Than Voter Wrote Contestee’s Name. — Where ballots at sehool district election contained printed name of contestant and name of contestee written in, but with no mark opposite either, ballots should be counted for contestee, in the absence of evidence that his name was written by someone other than voter; the intent of the respective voters being clearly expressed.On the thirtieth day of October, 1926, an election for a trustee of the Mesa Union High School District, situated in Maricopa county, was held. Before the election there was filed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stackpole v. HallahanMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hunt v. CampbellArizona Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Carwile v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Sorenson v. Superior Court of the State of Arizona Ex Rel. County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Montgomery v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McLoughlin v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Miller v. Picacho Elementary School District No. 33Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Moore v. City of PageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Baldauf v. GunsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  5. McDonald v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API