Legal Opinion
Application of Sentinel Government Securities
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 28, 1982No. M9-150PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
Movants Sentinel Government Securities (“SGS”) and Sentinel Financial Instruments (“SFI”) apply pursuant to Rule 41(e), F.R. Crim.P., 1 for an order directing the return of property seized under warrant. For the following reasons the motion is denied.
SGS and SFI are brokers and dealers in money market instruments and government securities. Certain aspects of their operations have attracted the interest of the In- ■ ternal Revenue Service. SFI is presently the target of a grand jury inquiry into whether it has engaged in a widespread false…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Premises Known as 225, 1468 & 1470 Statler Towers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Roberts v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Matter of Searches of Semtex Indus. Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Thompson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1993
- In re Two Search Warrants Issued March 14, 1986District Court, E.D. New York · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.