Legal Opinion
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 3, 1928No. 95PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Me.' Justice Brandéis
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Paragraph 9 of § 1 of the Interstate Commerce Act as amended provides that.“Any common carrier subject to the provisions of this Act, upon application of . . any shipper tendering interstate traffic for transportation, shall construct, maintain, and operate upon reasonable terms a switch connection with any . . private side track which may be constructed to connect with its railroad, where such connection is reasonably practicable and can be. put in with safety and will furnish sufficient business to justify the construction and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Colorado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- New York Central Securities Corporation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Beaumont, Sour Lake & Western Railway Co. v. BeaumontSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Railroad Commission of State of California Los Angeles & S. L. R. Co. v. Same. Southern Pac. Co. v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.