Legal Opinion

Allman v. David Berg B. & L. Ass'n

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1930No. Appeal 89PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The right of a stockholder to withdraw from a building and loan association and become entitled to the withdrawal value of his stock as fixed by the bylaws of the association, is confined to solvent associations. If the association is insolvent a notice of withdrawal is of no effect, and gives the member no right of action against the association: Christian’s App., 102 Pa. 184; Criswell’s App., 100 Pa. 488/

Appellee’s notice of withdrawal as a stockholder of the David Berg Building and Loan Association was given on November 15, 1928. Prior to that date, it is alleged in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Appeal of ChristianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  2. Kurtz v. BubeckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Appeal of CriswellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Odessa Independent Beneficial Assn. v. Stechert B. & L. Assn.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Rosenblatt v. Potential Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Wertheimer v. Morris Haber B. & L. Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. MacMullan v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1933
  5. Walsh v. New Tioga Leader Building & Loan Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API