Legal Opinion

State v. Constanza

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 8, 1924No. 26693PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.

Sam Constanza, M. Lee Mulcahy, and John Gallicio were charged with entering a dwelling house in the nighttime, with intent to steal, and with stealing $200 in currency, the property of Steve D’Asaro. When the evidence was concluded the prosecution was abandoned as to John Gallicio; the jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged as to the other two accused, and they were sentenced to imprisonment in the state penitentiary at hard labor for not less than four and one-half years nor more than five years. Erom this verdict and sentence they have appealed.

Appellants rely upon eight bills of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  2. State v. FourchySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
  3. State v. ForbesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  4. State v. MecheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  5. State v. ShoemakeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  2. State v. BartonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  3. State v. SingletonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API