Legal Opinion

Jesse v. Four Wheel Drive Auto Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1922PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.

This case presents a question of first impression to this court. We find no case directly in point.

*631The respondents cite us to Chabot & Richard Co. v. Chabot, 109 Me. 403, 84 Atl. 892; Hooker, C. & M. Co. v. Hooker, 88 Vt. 335, 92 Atl. 443; and Pickering v. Stephenson, L. R. 14 Eq. 322, as authorities for their position. In principle they have a bearing on this action.

This action presents a question of business morals quite as much as of law. Through corporations the major portion of the business of the country is conducted. • Formerly the corporation was small, the shareholders were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chabot & Richard Co. v. ChabotSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
  2. Hooker, Corser & Mitchell Co. v. HookerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  3. Goodwin v. von CotzhausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Highway Truck Drivers and Helpers Local 107 v. CohenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Otis & Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. In Re Dissolution of E. C. Warner Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. John v. JohnCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  5. L. R. Schmaus Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API