Legal Opinion
Malamood v. Kiamesha Concord, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 1, 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered July 7,1994, denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
On an earlier appeal (182 AD2d 359) we, inter alia, sustained plaintiffs decedent’s first cause of action for disability discrimination under Executive Law § 296 (1) (a), wherein it was claimed decedent was terminated from his cantorial services due to his medical condition. On this appeal, we agree with the IAS Court’s conclusion that triable material issues of fact exist concerning whether plaintiffs…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lazo v. Mak's Trading Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Lazo v. Mak's Trading Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Claim of Hopkins v. Players' Three, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Malamood v. Kiamesha Concord, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- Melbourne v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Goodwin v. Comcast Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Mason v. SpendiffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Tesillo v. Emergency Physician Associates, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Clemens v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.