Legal Opinion

McNelis v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 9, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

This writ of error brings under review a judgment of the Hustings Court of the city of Roanoke whereby certain premises in the city of Roanoke, owned by Mary McNelis, Anne McNelis, Bridget Boyle and Mary Foy, were ordered “padlocked, barred and closed,” for the reason that they were being used in violation of the provisions of section 55 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. Code 1936, section 4675(55).

Section 55 of the A. B. C. Act reads as follows:

“All houses, boat-houses, buildings, tents, club, fraternity and lodge rooms, boats, cars and places of every description including drug stores,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boggs v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keating v. State Ex Rel. AusebelSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Cox v. TaftWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Commonwealth v. ONE 1970, 2 DR. HT LINCOLN AUTO., ETC.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. Croatan Books, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Virginia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API