Legal Opinion

Foster v. Fidelity Safe Deposit Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Ho». John I. Williamson, Special Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

Defendant is a safe deposit company. It maintains individual safes or compartments •which it rents to customers for the safe-keeping of money and other valuable articles. Each of these contains a box which may be withdrawn and in which the customer places his money, papers or other valuable articles. It requires two keys to open one of these safes, one carried by the customer and the other by the attendant in charge. Its place of business is on the same floor and in practically the same room occupied by a banking institution known as the Fidelity Trust Company; it being separated therefrom by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hoagland v. Forest Park Highlands Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  2. Bowen v. SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Ferguson v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Danielson v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Weeks v. HackettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Humphreys Oil Co. v. LilesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Linscomb v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  3. Paset v. Old Orchard Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Flood v. City National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  5. Allred v. Beigel and EvansMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API