Legal Opinion

Hevel v. Stangier

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

This is an action for damages for the destruction of a building.

Plaintiffs and defendants were the owners of adjoining business buildings in Pendleton. The building owned by the defendants was gutted by fire. A three-story brick wall was left standing between the two buildings. During a windstorm thirty-three days after the fire, the wall collapsed upon the one-story building of the plaintiffs and inflicted extensive damage.

In this action, the plaintiffs alleged that the negligence of the defendants caused the destruction of the one-story building. The cause was tried to a jury which returned…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loe Et Ux v. LenhardOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Schweiger v. SolbeckOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. First National Bank v. StretcherOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Beidler v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Odd Fellows' Ass'n v. HegeleOregon Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Star MacHinery CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Johnson v. Star MacHinery CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Loper v. BrakelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API