Legal Opinion
Pemex Exploración Y Producción v. Murphy Energy Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided February 11, 2013No. Civil Action No. H-12-1081PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SIM LAKE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, PEMEX Exploración y Producción (“PEP”), has brought suit against multiple defendants for claims arising from sales in the United States of natural gas condensate allegedly stolen from PEP in Mexico. On June 8, 2012, the court held a scheduling conference and issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order (Docket Entry No. 106) granting three motions to dismiss to the extent that they sought dismissal of claims that PEP had asserted under Mexican law for illegal possession and use of Mexican sovereign property: (1) Defendant Sunoco…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Willie v. Amerada Hess Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- Brown v. M and N EavesDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2023
- Frisella v. Dallas CollegeDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
- Pliskin v. Radians Wareham Holding, Inc. (In re Icpw Liquidation Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Word v. Schwan's CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.