Legal Opinion

Walter v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 5, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for manslaughter. As we read this record, the evidence in the case did not show anything more than simple negligence. It fell far short of that culpable negligence required to be shown in order to sustain a conviction of manslaughter.

The judgment must be reversed upon the authority of Russ v. State, 140 Fla. 217, 191 So. 296, wherein it was said.

“This Court is committed to the rule that the degree of negligence required to sustain imprisonment should be at least as high as that required for the imposition of punitive damages in a civil action.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bessie Cannon v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Russ v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  4. Kent v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  5. Shaw v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CatellierWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  2. O'Berry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Carr v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. McDougal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Blok v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API