Legal Opinion

Hammerman v. Ferguson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, in which a judgment of foreclosure and sale was entered upon default, the intervenor defendant, Fridal Enterprises, Inc. (assignee of the purchaser at the foreclosure sale), appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 23, 1975, which, upon a renewed motion of defendant Marianna Ferguson to vacate the judgment and set aside the sale, (1) denied the motion only to the extent of permitting the judgment to stand; (2) revoked the sale and set aside the deed given appellant, upon condition that said defendant pay…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Superintendent of BanksNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Housman v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Alben Affiliates v. Astoria Terminal, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Moller v. WattsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re PearsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  2. Onondaga Savings Bank v. Cale Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Trefoil Capital Corp. v. Creed Taylor, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Chase Manhattan Bank v. LeacockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Crossland Mortgage Corp. v. FrankelNew York Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API