Legal Opinion

Matter of O'Esau v. . E.W. Bliss Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1918PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 5,1918, affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

1Per curiam

One John M. O’Esau was an employee of E. W. Bliss Company and as such engaged in a hazardous employment. On March 28, 1916, while engaged in his employment he received an injury. Objection was made by appellants before the industrial commission that the claim made by O’Esau was not filed with the commission within the time required by law. An award was made by the commission November 17, 1917, the decision of the commission reciting that the claim for compensation was filed with the commission more than one year after the date of the injury, to wit, June 6, 1917. The employer and carrier…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reed v. . FarrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Claim of O'Esau v. E. W. Bliss Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  2. Wisdom v. WisdomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Bronheim v. KelleherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. Auerbach v. Commercial Capital Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Claim of Relay v. Reid Ice Cream Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API