Legal Opinion

Maple v. Maple

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1977No. 14888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Defendant, James C. Maple, appeals from findings and decree which declared the marriage between him and plaintiff, Pan-nee Srisung Maple, to be null and void, granted to the plaintiff a settlement of $1200, equivalent to the expenses necessary for the return to Thailand of herself and of her young son by her prior marriage. Neither the plaintiff nor the defendant contest the ruling thus terminating the marriage.

The only issue involved here is defendant’s contention that since the marriage was annulled he should have no further obligation to the plaintiff; and that thus the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wiese v. WieseUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Noble v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Nevins v. NevinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Evans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edgar v. WagnerUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Jacobsen v. BunkerUtah Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API