Legal Opinion

Payne v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 23, 1974No. 281-72PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRunzig, Judge

This is a suit for the recovery of $15,486.60 in federal income tax paid for the year 1966, plus interest on that amount. The dispute before us involves the relationship between the net-operating-loss carryback provision of Internal Eevenue Code section 172 and the income-averaging provision of former section 1301. In our opinion, plaintiffs may not create a double tax benefit by combining the operations of these two relief provisions. Consequently, we hold for the Government.

None of the facts is controverted. In 1966, plaintiff William Payne received $713,625 in payment for legal services…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ernest L. Wilkinson and Alice L. Wilkinson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Maurice J. Breen and Alyce J. Breen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  3. Redpath v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  4. United States v. Calvin A. Behle and Grace C. BebleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bodine Electric Co. v. AllphinIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bodine Electric Co. v. AllphinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Beckman v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1975
  4. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. McQuiston v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API