Legal Opinion

Richmond Medical Center For Women v. Hicks

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 2, 2005No. 04-1255PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

422 F.3d 160

RICHMOND MEDICAL CENTER FOR WOMEN; William G. Fitzhugh, M.D., on behalf of themselves, their staffs, and their patients, Plaintiffs—Appellees,

v.

David M. HICKS, in his official capacity as Commonwealth Attorney for the City of Richmond; Wade A. Kizer, in his official capacity as Commonwealth Attorney for the County of Henrico, Defendants—Appellants.

Horatio R. Storer Foundation, Incorporated, Amicus Supporting Appellants,

Physicians for Reproductive Choice and Health; Vanessa E. Cullins, Vice President for Medical Affairs, Planned Parenthood Federation of America; Forty-Two…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence · Wilkinson; Concurrence · Luttig; Concurrence · Michael.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Stenberg v. CarhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Sabri v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richmond Medical Center for Women v. HerringCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API