Legal Opinion

Danny E. Durham v. Heather R. Durham

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 17, 2013No. 26A01-1211-DR-514Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Jul 17 2013, 5:55 am Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: CHRISTINE L. SAINT JOHN JERRY D. STILWELL Rhine-Ernest Bamberger, Foreman, Oswald and Hahn, LLP Evansville, Indiana Princeton, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA DANNY E. DURHAM, ) ) Appellant-Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) No. 26A01-1211-DR-514 ) HEATHER R. DURHAM, ) ) Appellee-Respondent. )…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thacker v. WentzelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Cavens v. ZaberdacIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. O'Connell v. O'ConnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Wanner v. HutchcroftIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Capehart v. CapehartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API