Baker v. United States Department of the Interior Board of Mine Operations Appeals
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by TAMM, Circuit Judge.
TAMM, Circuit Judge:
In this case we are called upon to interpret section 110(b) of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969 (the Act).1 *362In accord with the recent precedent of this court, and the legislative intent behind section 110(b), we hold that a miner who makes a safety complaint is protected from employer retaliation whether or not the miner intended the complaint to reach federal officials at the time it was made.2 We also hold that an administrative law judge considering an application for relief under section 110(b) may…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Franklin Phillips v. Interior Board of Mine Operations Appeals, Bituminous Coaloperators' Association and Kentucky Carbon Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Munsey v. MortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Glenn Munsey v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission, Smitty Baker Coal Co., Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
3Cited by6 opinions
- Neal v. Honeywell, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Marshall v. Whirlpool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Donovan ex rel. Anderson v. Stafford Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Glenn Munsey v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission, Smitty Baker Coal Co., Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Hill v. MR. MONEY FINANCE CO.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.