Legal Opinion

Austin v. Marsico

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1926No. 600-4431PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.

On or before the 15th day of July, 1921, the Denison Bank .& Trust Company was doing a banking business under the laws of the state of Texas, on which last-named date it became insolvent, and on which date, as well as before that time, N. Marsico appeared upon the books of the bank to be the owner and holder of 15 shares of its capital stock, having apparently become so by reason of a written transfer from R. T. Arthur and the procurement by Marsico from the bank of the cancellation of the Arthur stock and the issuance to him of new stock in lieu thereof, all within one year prior to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Rankin v. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Finn v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Kerr v. UrieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  5. Austin v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Orndorff v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Alba Nat. Bank v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Austin v. GambleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Shaw v. HaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Shaw v. KopeckyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API