Legal Opinion

BARR v. DUDEK

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 2025No. 2:23-cv-04018Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHELLE B.1, : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION v. : No. 23-4018 : LELAND DUDEK, : Acting Commissioner of : Social Security, : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM JOSÉ RAÚL ARTEAGA March 7, 2025 United States Magistrate Judge2 The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, through an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”), denied Michelle B.’s application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383. Michelle B. seeks judicial review of the final administrative decision…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API