Legal Opinion

Thompson/Center Arms Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 23, 1990No. 652-88TPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Judge.

Plaintiff, a firearms manufacturer, claims a $200 tax refund, alleging that the tax was erroneously collected. The special excise tax at issue in this case is levied on the “making” of items statutorily defined as “firearms” under the National Firearms Act (NFA or Act). 26 U.S.C. § 5801 et seq., § 5821. The parties disagree as to whether two of the plaintiff’s products— the Contender pistol, possessed in conjunction with the Contender Carbine Kit — together comprise a “firearm” under 26 U.S.C. § 5845(a), which is thus taxable under the NFA. This case is before the court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Mt. Hood Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. William Calvin WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Marshall L. ZeidmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. Gerald Drasen, Anthony Aleo, and Cynthia AleoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Thompson/center Arms Company, a Division of the K.W. Thompson Tool Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API