Papania v. Stelly

OPINION ON REMAND

HILL, Justice

(Assigned).

Michael Papania appeals from a summary judgment that he take nothing against Er-mon Stelly, the appellee. He contends in three points of error that the trial court erred in: (1) allowing Stelly to withdraw and amend his answers to Papania’s Request for Admissions in violation of Tex.R. Civ. P. 169(2); (2) granting Stelly’s Motion for Summary Judgment because fact issues exist regarding the ownership and control of the *654premises upon which he was injured; and (3) granting Stell/s Motion for Summary Judgment in that Stelly failed to maintain the land or…