Legal Opinion

Henley v. Foreclosure Sales, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs deeded their home to the defendant, and the parties signed an occupancy and option agreement. The plaintiffs commenced this action for a judgment declaring the deed to be a mortgage. A prior motion by the defendant for summary judgment was denied, and this Court affirmed, stating that a deed, “ ‘although absolute on its face, will be considered to be a mortgage when the instrument is executed as security for a debt’ ” (Henley v Foreclosure Sales, Inc., 39 AD3d 470 [2007], quoting Basile v Erhal Holding Corp., 148 AD2d 484, 485 [1989]). This Court further found that questions of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Basile v. Erhal Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Henley v. Foreclosure Sales, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Linden v. MoskowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Schilling v. MalarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API