Legal Opinion

Crouse v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided May 8, 1987No. A-1800PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SINGLETON, Judge.

In this case, we are asked to establish standards governing the imposition of a previously suspended sentence where a defendant’s conduct makes it clear that he cannot be rehabilitated on probation.

William Crouse was convicted upon his plea of nolo contendere of: burglary in the first degree, AS 11.46.300(a)(1); forgery in the third degree, AS 11.46.510(a)(1); and, criminal mischief in the second degree, AS 11.46.482(a)(4). The three cases were consolidated for sentencing. On August 20, 1982, Superior Court Judge Ralph E. Moody suspended imposition of sentence for five…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Austin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
  3. State v. WorthamAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Leuch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. GraybillAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Luepke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
  2. Toney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990
  3. Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990
  4. Moya v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API