Legal Opinion

Pekin Insurance v. Phelan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 29, 2003No. 3-02-0933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lytton

Plaintiff, Pekin Insurance Company (Pekin), appeals the circuit court’s judgment that it had a duty to defend a suit against its insured, Ann Phelan, and her business, R. Rootz Salon. The underlying suit, initiated by Imaginations on Hair, Inc. (Imaginations), alleges that Phelan and others made statements intended to lure customers away from Imaginations. Phelan claimed coverage from the suit under her business insurance policy underwritten by Pekin. Pekin argues that the underlying complaint does not allege conduct covered by the insurance policy because Phelan’s statements did not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. American States Insurance v. KolomsIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Marsh v. Evangelical Covenant ChurchIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Lexmark International, Inc. v. Transportation InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Crinkley v. Dow Jones & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Right Field Rooftops, LLC v. Chicago Cubs Baseball Club, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. John J. Rickhoff Sheet Metal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Green4All Energy Solutions, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  4. Right Field Rooftops, LLC v. Chicago Cubs Baseball Club, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  5. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API