Legal Opinion

Mills v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1989No. Nos. 89-1196, 89-1197PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellants were indicted in the Superior Court for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute it1 and possession of drug paraphernalia.2 After they were arraigned, the government extended to each of them an offer of a plea of guilty to a lesser included offense. Some time later a dispute arose as to whether the plea offers had been rejected or withdrawn or whether they were still open. The trial court, after a hearing, found that the offers had been withdrawn, and ruled that appellants had no right to enforce them against the government. See Mabry v. Johnson, 467…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. United States v. John Lanham, Iii, United States of America v. William Troy, William P. Trolinger, Iii, and April L. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. CummingsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Albert E. Mills. United States of America v. Kenneth B. Wonson. United States of America v. Vernon L. HollandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API