Legal Opinion

Keith v. Drainage Dist. No. 7 of Poinsett County

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 11, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, C. J.

This is an original application for a writ of mandamus by Harry A. Keith and Mamie Keith against A. H. Landers, sheriff of Poinsett County, Arkansas, to compel him to levy an execution on certain real and personal property to satisfy a judgment rendered in this court in favor of petitioners against Drainage District No. 7 of Poinsett County in the sum of $3,200, with interest and costs.

The judgment was obtained under the provisions of § 22 of the Bill of Bights- of our present Constitution, which provides that private property shall not be taken or damaged for public use without just…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fordyce v. Woman's Christian National Library Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. Fitzgerald v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  3. Klein v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Mayfield Woolen Mills v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Lewis v. RieffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Sanford v. McClellandSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  2. Cargile v. New York Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. City of Sanford v. Dofnos Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. State Ex Rel. Select Tenures, Inc. v. RaulersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. RyeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API