Waskey v. McNaught
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The plaintiffs brought this suit in ejectment to recover the possession of a portion of a mining claim which the defendants had entered and ousted the plaintiffs. The value of the ground' in controversy consists in the gold-bearing earth, sand, and gravel contained therein. The defendants admit they are severing and extracting this gold-bearing material and depositing it in a dump on the premises. The extraction and removal of this gold-bearing material from the ground will necessarily destroy its value and render ineffectual any judgment that may be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Curtis v. SutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Natoma Water & Mining Co. v. ClarkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Hicks v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. El Paso Gold Mines, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Mitchell v. Beaver Dredging Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1935