Legal Opinion

Brown v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 2005No. 01-CF-1259PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASHINGTON, Chief Judge.

After a jury trial, appellant Henry Brown (“Brown”) was convicted of two counts of unlawful distribution of a controlled substance 1 and one count of unlawful possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance. 2 On appeal, Brown contends that the trial court committed prejudicial error when it instructed the jury (1) that the government had “no duty” to collect corroborative evidence; and (2) that the jury’s verdict must be based “solely on the evidence presented at the trial,” arguing that the combination of these instructions prevented the jury from finding…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. United States v. Stanley Weisz, United States of America v. Eugene Robert CiuzioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Wheeler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Washington Investment Partners of Delaware, LLC v. Securities HouseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Graham v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Blaine v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API