Legal Opinion

Deak v. Pace, Jr., Secretary of Army. Patton v. Pace, Jr., Secretary of Army

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 7, 1950No. 10407_1PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PROCTOR, Circuit Judge.

Appellants in these consolidated appeals were civilian employees of the War Department at the Army Finance Center, St. Louis, Missouri. They were summarily removed from their positions by the Secretary of War, acting under authority of Section 3, Act of December 17, 1942, 56 Stat. 1053, 5 U.S.C.A. § 652 note,1 upon the ground that such action was “warranted by the demands of national security.”

As we view the case it is reduced to the simple question whether the Secretary complied with the requirement of the statute that the discharged employees “be fully informed of the…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Stanford Monroe Welcker v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Powell v. Brannan, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  3. Almour v. Pace, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  4. Boucher v. Division of Employment Security of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  5. Jason v. Summerfield, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API