State v. Ford
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our opinion in State v. Ford, 244 Or App 289, 260 P3d 637 (2011). In that case, defendant appealed a judgment of conviction for two counts of third-degree sexual abuse. ORS 163.415. Defendant assigned error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress incriminating statements made after he was stopped and questioned by police. We determined that the statements were made in compelling circumstances and in the absence of Miranda warnings, and thus were obtained contrary to Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution. We reversed the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. FordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GrimmCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. MattheisenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.