Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sacchi v. Blodig

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1983No. 82-301Published

1DissentBoslaugh, J.

The majority opinion concludes that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-222 (Reissue 1979) codifies the discovery rule and therefore permits the legal disabilities of insanity and infancy when applicable to toll the running of § 25-222 such that an action may be brought even after 10 years has passed from the date of the alleged negligent act or omission. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-213 (Reissue 1979). This is an incorrect interpretation of § 25-222, which is a statute of ultimate repose requiring all actions based upon a claim of professional negligence to be brought within 10 years.

Section 25-222 provides:…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. O'CONNOR v. Abraham AltusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. Harrison v. SchraderTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Watts v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Colton v. DeweyNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Jennifer Kay Brumit Mathis and Her Husband, Barry L. Mathis, Plaintiffs v. Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API