Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Donoghue

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided December 13, 1937No. 7857Published

1Opinion of the Court

McDevitt, P. J.,

This matter comes before the court on a suggestion for a writ of quo warranto addressed to Joseph Donoghue and Herbert J. McGlinchey, directing them to show by what authority they claim to possess or exercise the offices of mercantile appraisers for the City and County of Philadelphia.

The controversy revolves about the Act of May 28, 1937, P. L. 1052, which reads as follows:

“Section 1. Be it enacted, &c., That section one of the act, approved the seventeenth day of July, one thousand nine hundred nineteen (Pamphlet Laws, one thousand twenty-five), entitled ‘A supplement to an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Utermehle v. NormentSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Suermann v. Hadley, Treas. (White)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Rothermel v. Meyerle, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API